**After reading this, we recommend checking out the related Case Study**
Introduction
Construction and demolition (C&D) waste constitutes one of the largest waste streams in Europe, yet much of it is potentially recoverable. Pre-demolition audits have therefore gained prominence as a first step towards recycling and appropriate C&D waste management, by collecting detailed information on all building elements, their quantities, and their possible post-demolition treatment paths. This process allows stakeholders to plan selective demolition and material recovery in line with the waste hierarchy (prioritizing reuse and recycling over disposal) as mandated by the EU Waste Framework Directive. In practice, a pre-demolition audit involves a thorough survey of a building prior to its demolition (or major renovation), identifying both hazardous substances and salvageable materials, and providing recommendations for their handling. By performing such audits well in advance, project teams can maximize the high-quality reuse of components and ensure safe removal of contaminants, supporting the broader goals of circular construction.
Regulatory drivers at the European and national levels underscore the importance of pre-demolition audits. The European Commission’s guidelines and the EU Construction & Demolition Waste Management Protocol (2018) recommend that “a pre-demolition audit must be carried out for all demolition or major renovation projects”, detailing the quantities and qualities of materials and components for reuse, recycling, or proper disposal. The EU’s Waste Framework Directive set a target of 70% recycling of C&D waste by 2020, pushing Member States to adopt measures like mandatory audits to improve resource recovery. Many countries have responded by developing standards and best practices for these audits. Notably, Austria’s ÖNORM B3151 and Germany’s DIN SPEC 91484 provide structured procedures to ensure audits are comprehensive and produce uniform results across projects. ÖNORM B3151, “Dismantling of buildings as a standard method of demolition,” defines the tasks, auditor qualifications, and even templates for conducting pre-demolition audits. It includes, for example, a checklist of hazardous materials commonly found in buildings (asbestos, PCB, etc.) that must be identified and removed prior to demolition. Meanwhile, DIN SPEC 91484:2023 – “Procedure to record building materials as a base to evaluate the high-quality reutilization potential prior to demolition and renovation work (pre-demolition audit)” – was introduced to standardize how material inventories are carried out in Germany. This specification outlines requirements for information gathering, the audit report content, the process stages, the stakeholders involved, and the tools that can be used. Crucially, it emphasizes delivering a sufficient and uniform level of data about all building products for all actors in the value chain, reflecting a clear intent to integrate these audits into circular economy workflows.
Concurrently, the AEC industry is undergoing a digital transformation that offers new ways to meet these regulatory requirements. 3D scanning and BIM technologies have matured to enable rapid digitization of existing buildings – often termed “scan-to-BIM”. Metaroom, a state-of-the-art 3D scanning solution by Amrax, exemplifies this trend. Using a mobile LiDAR-enabled device, Metaroom can quickly capture the geometry of an entire building interior and generate a navigable 3D model or BIM representation. With recent advancements, it supports multi-room, multi-floor scanning to create one comprehensive model of a structure. The output can be exported in standard Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) format, ready for analysis in BIM software. By employing Metaroom for a pre-demolition audit, practitioners aim to obtain a complete digital twin of the building slated for demolition, which can then serve as the basis for material quantity take-offs, identification of reusable components, and documentation of hazardous spots. This approach aligns closely with the direction of DIN SPEC 91484, which anticipates that digital tools such as 3D scans will “facilitate and optimize the recording of materials” for future audits. In fact, DIN SPEC 91484 explicitly lists 3D scanning (alongside QR tagging and image recognition) as innovations to support the human auditor, foreseeing a future where building stock exists in digital building models that can be directly used for such audits.
This white paper focuses on how Metaroom’s 3D scanning technology could be applied to conduct pre-demolition audits that are both efficient (in terms of time and accuracy) and compliant with new regulations and standards. We first outline the key requirements of ÖNORM B3151 and DIN SPEC 91484 and discuss the role of pre-demolition audits in promoting circular construction. We then delve into the Metaroom system and how its capabilities – rapid scanning, point cloud/BIM generation, integration of metadata – can streamline the audit process. In the discussion, we analyze the benefits (speed, data richness, safety, compliance facilitation) and limitations (material identification challenges, need for expert input, technological constraints) of using 3D scanning and BIM for this purpose. Finally, we connect these findings to the broader implications for sustainability in the construction sector, highlighting how digital pre-demolition audits support circular economy objectives by enabling high-quality reuse of building materials.
Pre-Demolition Audits and Standards for Circular Construction
Pre-demolition audits (PDAs) have a clear environmental and regulatory rationale. By performing a systematic audit of a building before demolition, project teams can identify which materials can be safely removed for reuse or recycling and which hazardous materials require special handling. According to the European Commission’s guidance, a pre-demolition audit involves “collecting and assessing information about the qualities and quantities of construction products for re-use [and] C&D waste materials with potential for recycling, as well as other types of waste that will be generated”, and issuing recommendations for the demolition process. A key part of the audit is pinpointing any materials containing hazardous substances that could hinder reuse or pose environmental/health risks. In essence, the audit serves as a materials inventory and condition assessment, which is fundamental for planning a selective demolition that aligns with the waste hierarchy (i.e. prioritize reuse, then recycling, then disposal).
ÖNORM B3151 (Austria) is one of the pioneering national standards in this domain. First published in 2014 (and updated in 2022), it established dismantling of buildings as the standard method of demolition, effectively mandating thorough planning and sorting rather than indiscriminate wrecking. ÖNORM B3151 delineates the tasks to perform a pre-demolition audit in detail. This includes specifying the qualifications and responsibilities of auditors, providing structured templates for audit reports, and listing typical locations of problematic substances within building elements. For example, the standard offers guidance on where to check for contaminants like asbestos (insulation, old floor tiles), PCBs (sealants, paints), or heavy metals, ensuring these are identified and safely removed prior to general demolition. By following ÖNORM B3151, demolition planners in Austria can produce an audit report that details all materials (categorized by type and potential fate), which then informs a demolition and waste management plan. The relevance of this standard to new digital tools is that it provides a clear scope and checklist for what data must be captured. A tool like Metaroom can be leveraged to gather much of the required data (dimensions, quantities, locations of materials) efficiently, while the auditor supplements the scan with information on material composition and hazardous content as required by the standard. Indeed, ÖNORM B3151 even anticipates the use of electronic tools or templates to evaluate waste streams, highlighting that a combination of human expertise and digital assistance is the optimal approach.
DIN SPEC 91484 (Germany) (Figure 1), published in September 2023, builds upon such concepts with a more explicit focus on high-quality reuse potential and data standardization. It was developed by industry experts (in collaboration with organizations like Concular, a platform for circular construction materials) to serve as a guideline for pre-demolition audits across Germany. The DIN SPEC defines a procedure for recording all building products in a structure slated for demolition or major renovation, aiming to provide “sufficient and uniform data depth at all points of the value chain” regarding these products. In practice, this means establishing a consistent format and content for the audit’s output so that everyone – from the building owner and demolition contractor to recycling facilities and potential reuse buyers – can rely on the information. The specification covers: the information collection process (e.g. desk study of documents, on-site survey, laboratory testing of materials), the required content of the final audit documentation, the roles of various experts (such as waste auditors, hazardous material specialists, structural assessors), and importantly, the tools that can be used to carry out and present the audit. It explicitly lists “basic requirements for tools” that assist in the audit, implying that software or digital systems used for audits should be able to handle the data fields and reporting needs defined by the standard. The inclusion of tools in DIN SPEC 91484 is significant: it acknowledges modern technologies (for example, BIM databases or scanning devices) as integral to the audit process, and it sets the stage for solutions like Metaroom to be used in a standardized workflow.
Figure 1 DIN SPEC 91484 document (link available in references)
One notable aspect of DIN SPEC 91484 is its future-oriented perspective on digitization. In its foreword, the document states that beyond the basic requirements, future innovations and developments are of interest to improve material recording. It cites QR codes, image recognition, 3D scans, and RFID tags as examples of digital tools that can support human recording of materials. The long-term vision is that as the building stock becomes increasingly digitized (through BIM from design/construction phases), those digital building models can be directly used for the audit, reducing the need for laborious on-site data capture. In the interim, however, the use of scanning technology can bridge the gap by creating a digital model where none exists. Thus, DIN SPEC 91484 essentially gives a green light to scan-to-BIM approaches, positioning them as compatible with (and beneficial to) standardized audit practices. It is in this context that Metaroom’s capabilities become highly relevant – the technology embodies exactly the kind of tool the DIN specification envisions to streamline pre-demolition audits.
Both ÖNORM B3151 and DIN SPEC 91484 ultimately serve the higher goal of advancing circular construction. By ensuring that before a building is demolished, its material constituents are catalogued and evaluated, these standards support stakeholders in salvaging valuable building components and recycling materials, rather than sending bulk debris to landfills. This practice reduces waste and conserves resources, feeding into circular economy loops. For instance, if an audit (conducted per these standards) finds that a building has hundreds of square meters of good-quality brick facade, those bricks can be recovered, cleaned, and repurposed in new construction – but only if they were identified and planned for salvage in advance. The standards also improve transparency: they create an official record of what a demolished building yielded, which can be used to verify recycling rates and environmental performance. In cities like Berlin, such audits are becoming part of regulation – an administrative ordinance in Berlin now requires examining the reuse potential of all public buildings prior to demolition. This local rule, aligned with the spirit of DIN SPEC 91484, is one example of how audit standards are being translated into policy to drive circular outcomes. In summary, pre-demolition audit standards define what data is needed and how to structure the process, while digital tools like Metaroom define how to gather and manage that data in an efficient manner.
Applying Metaroom 3D Scanning to Pre-Demolition Audits
Metaroom is a 3D scanning application designed to quickly create detailed digital models of existing spaces. Using the LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) sensors available on modern mobile devices (e.g. iPad Pro or iPhone Pro), Metaroom allows practitioners to walk through a building and capture millions of spatial data points (Figure 2). The result is a rich point cloud and mesh that represent the geometry of rooms, walls, openings, structural elements, and even fixtures. What sets Metaroom apart as a tool for pre-demolition audits is its focus on speed, scale, and integration: recent updates to the platform have enabled large-scale, multi-floor scanning so that an entire building (floor by floor, room by room) can be combined into one comprehensive 3D model. This is crucial for audits, as it ensures no part of the building is omitted from the survey. Traditional laser scanning or manual measurements could take days for a large building, whereas a Metaroom scan can be done in hours, with the data automatically stitched together.
Figure 2 Scanning procedure
Once the scan is completed, Metaroom processes the data into a coherent 3D model which can be exported as an IFC file – the standard open format for BIM. This means the model can be imported into any BIM or CAD software (such as Autodesk Revit, Graphisoft Archicad, etc.) for further analysis. Within the Metaroom Studio interface, users can inspect the model, measure dimensions, and even overlay additional information (Figure 3). One particularly powerful feature for pre-demolition audits is the integration of metadata via QR codes. Metaroom’s scanning app can automatically recognize QR code tags in the environment and link them into the 3D model. In practice, this could be used as follows: prior to scanning, an auditor might place QR code stickers on certain items or components in the building – for instance, tagging structural beams, pieces of equipment, or batches of material with a code that corresponds to an entry in a materials database. As Metaroom scans and encounters each QR code, it logs its position and can embed a hyperlink or data snippet in the model. Later, when reviewing the model in Metaroom Studio or another BIM tool, the auditor can click on that tagged object and retrieve associated information (such as material type, weight, potential reuse value, or hazardous content). This capability effectively creates a digital audit trail within the 3D model, combining geometry with semantic data. It directly supports the recommendation from standards and guides to uniquely mark reusable elements and record their location for post-demolition tracking. Instead of relying on paper labels or disconnected spreadsheets, Metaroom embeds this info visually in the scan, enhancing traceability of each component.
Figure 3 Metaroom Studio
Another feature conducive to audit work is automated room segmentation. Metaroom’s algorithms can detect room boundaries and split the scan data by spaces (rooms) automatically. This helps when organizing the audit information – many audit reports are structured room-by-room or element-by-element. By having the scan segmented, an auditor can more easily attach notes like “Room 101 – contains X kg of brick, Y m² of glass, Z units of luminaires for reuse”. Moreover, the digital model can serve as a canvas for the auditor to annotate findings. In the pilot mentioned above, auditors used Metaroom’s point-of-interest feature to mark an “installation opening” in the building. This kind of mark-up could indicate, for example, a void that needs to be closed or an area with suspected hazardous material. These in-model annotations are analogous to the notes an auditor would make on drawings or checklists, but with the benefit of precise 3D location. They believed such digital markers “could be instrumental in identifying and marking special parts of the building, such as valuable equipment or hazardous materials”. This illustrates how the combination of a scan with interactive documentation features creates a robust audit dataset: geometry + attributes + annotations.
In terms of workflow, using Metaroom for a pre-demolition audit might involve the following steps:
- Preparation (Desk Study): Before scanning, gather existing drawings, past renovation records, and any known information about the building (year built, materials used, known hazardous surveys). This aligns with the initial desk study phase of standard audit procedures. The auditor can plan which elements to focus on and possibly place QR tags on key items as described.
- On-site Scanning: Perform the 3D scan using the Metaroom app, covering all accessible areas. Ensure clear line-of-sight to all surfaces (moving furniture or debris as needed) to get a complete model. During scanning, use the app’s interface to drop point-of-interest pins at notable locations (e.g., areas requiring sample collection or elements identified for reuse). If some elements are concealed or inaccessible (for instance, insulation inside walls), the auditor notes those separately as they would in a normal audit (the scan won’t capture hidden material, but it can mark the location if known).
- Initial Processing and Inspection: Upload the captured data to Metaroom Studio. The system generates the composite 3D model, segmented by rooms, with any captured QR code data attached. The auditor can then navigate the digital building remotely, ensuring everything was captured. This stage might already reveal rough quantities – for example, measuring the volume of a concrete slab in the model or counting doors and windows. It essentially provides a digital double-check to what the auditor observed on-site, potentially highlighting areas that might have been missed (if a room is incomplete in the model, it signals the need to rescan or take manual data).
- BIM Integration and Detailed Analysis: Export the IFC model to a BIM platform. Here, the auditor (or a BIM specialist working with them) can refine the model by classifying components and adding information. For instance, surfaces in the point cloud can be converted to BIM objects: walls, slabs, columns, etc., either manually or using semi-automated Scan-to-BIM software. Metaroom’s output might already simplify some geometry, but an explicit BIM model allows assignment of material properties to each element (e.g., label a wall as “brick masonry”, a beam as “steel”, etc.). With these classifications, quantity takeoff tools can compute totals like the area of tiling, length of pipes, volume of concrete, all directly from the model. This addresses a key part of the audit – determining the quantities of each material that will arise from demolition.
- Output and Reporting: Finally, the information collected is compiled into the pre-demolition audit report. Even though we have a digital model, regulatory compliance often requires a written report or documentation in a prescribed format (per ÖNORM or DIN SPEC guidelines). Using the data from the BIM, the auditor can fill in the required report sections – typically an inventory table of materials (distinguishing those for reuse, recycle, disposal), a section on hazardous materials found and recommended actions, and a demolition plan. Because of the 3D scan, these sections can be populated with a higher degree of confidence. For example, the material inventory can cite quantities derived from the model (with minimal guesswork), and it might reference the model for location details. The report could include snapshots of the 3D model highlighting specific items (e.g., an image of a scanned room with certain components flagged for salvage). In some cases, the BIM model itself could be delivered to the client or authorities as a supplement to the report, offering full transparency – this digital record could be invaluable for future verification or if questions arise during demolition (like “did we account for that partition wall’s material?” – it’s visible in the model and listed in the audit).
By following such a workflow, Metaroom essentially becomes the backbone of the data collection effort for the audit. It can drastically reduce the manual labor of measuring and taking notes on every building element. Instead of manually sketching floor layouts and marking materials (as was traditionally done), the auditor gets an immersive digital replica to work with. This improves not only efficiency but also accuracy: measurements taken from point clouds are often within a few centimeters of true dimensions, which is typically sufficient for estimating material quantities. Moreover, having a point cloud/BIM forces comprehensiveness – one can virtually walk through the building and cross-check that every space and element has been considered, something much harder to do with just paper checklists.
In the context of compliance with ÖNORM B3151 and DIN SPEC 91484, using Metaroom can help meet many requirements. For example, DIN SPEC 91484 expects the audit to produce a “demolition cadastre” or detailed listing of all materials and components. Metaroom’s output can directly feed such a cadastre with structured data. If the standard asks for the location of each reusable element to be documented, the QR code + model approach fulfills that elegantly. If ÖNORM B3151 provides a template table for hazardous materials, the auditor can more easily fill it by cross-referencing the model (ensuring that if a certain type of material is present in the building, it was checked for hazardous content). Additionally, since DIN SPEC 91484 requires involvement of various experts (e.g., a pollutant assessor for hazardous substances, a building product tester for checking reusability of certain, the digital model can serve as a common platform where each expert can attach their findings. For instance, a hazardous material consultant could examine the model and mark locations where asbestos was sampled and found (with lab results attached, perhaps via a note), while a structural engineer could mark which beams are suitable for reuse. This multidisciplinary input can all be consolidated in one digital space, making the final audit more integrated.
In summary, Metaroom provides the technological means to conduct a thorough and efficient pre-demolition audit. It captures the as-built reality of the structure in high detail, supports the data requirements of current standards through its export and annotation features, and enhances the auditor’s ability to identify and quantify reusable or hazardous materials. In the next section, we evaluate the specific benefits observed or expected from this approach, as well as its current limitations and challenges, to give a balanced perspective.
Pre-Demolition Audits, Circular Construction, and Sustainability
The drive to implement tools like Metaroom in pre-demolition audits is ultimately rooted in the pursuit of a more circular and sustainable construction industry. By thoroughly auditing buildings before they come down, we address a pivotal stage in the building lifecycle that historically has been very wasteful. C&D waste accounts for roughly one third of all waste generated in the EU, so improvements in how we deal with end-of-life buildings can have a significant environmental impact. Pre-demolition audits directly support the principles of circular construction by enabling two key outcomes: maximizing reuse of components and ensuring proper recycling of materials.
A well-executed audit (especially one enriched with detailed 3D data) acts as a facilitator for keeping materials in use. It identifies which components can be extracted intact and potentially reused – examples might include structural steel beams, masonry units, facade panels, timber elements, doors, fixtures, etc. If these are documented and handled carefully, they can be re-certified or tested and given a second life in new projects, drastically reducing the need to manufacture new products. This ties into the concept of Urban Mining, where cities are seen as repositories of materials that can be mined (reclaimed) rather than thrown away. By using BIM to catalog materials from an old building, we essentially create a materials bank record that can feed into urban mining databases. The audit is the moment when a building transitions from being an operational asset to a material resource.
In addition, the audit helps in recycling what cannot be directly reused. Knowing the quantities of concrete, brick, glass, metal, etc., in advance allows coordination with recyclers. For instance, concrete can be crushed into aggregate if one knows how much will come and arranges the proper equipment; steel can be sent to smelters; uncontaminated brick or tile can become crushed masonry for roadbeds. The audit’s accuracy ensures that contamination is minimized – materials streams are segregated properly (something emphasized in ÖNORM B3151, which specifies separation during dismantling). In short, the audit guided by tools like Metaroom is an enabler of high-quality recycling, meaning materials are recycled in a form as close as possible to their original use (not down-cycled or wasted). This aligns with the “high-quality reutilization” language of DIN SPEC 91484, signaling an intent to keep materials at their highest value.
From a sustainability perspective, there are also substantial carbon emission benefits. The production of new building materials (cement, steel, etc.) is carbon-intensive. Reusing materials avoids those emissions, and recycling generally cuts them down (though by how much depends on the material and process). Pre-demolition audits indirectly reduce carbon footprint by enabling reuse/recycling; some studies have shown that reusing structural steel or aluminum facade elements, for example, can save 50-95% of the energy compared to new production. While our focus is on the process, these outcomes are worth noting as they contribute to climate goals. Moreover, by identifying hazardous materials (like asbestos, lead, mercury-containing equipment) and ensuring they are dealt with, audits prevent these pollutants from being released into the environment during demolition. This protects soil and groundwater quality and avoids health risks for workers and the public.
The introduction of digital tools makes these sustainability gains more attainable by addressing practical barriers (like difficulty of doing audits). Industry observers have noted that “sustainable practices are no longer optional; they’re essential” and that the market needs “quick and easy #scantobim solutions” to implement practices like pre-demolition audits at scale. In other words, without efficient tools, conducting a detailed audit on every demolition could be seen as too slow or costly; with tools like Metaroom, it becomes feasible to do this routinely. Thus, digitization is helping mainstream the circular practices rather than them remaining niche pilot projects. It’s telling that even finance and policy frameworks are evolving to support this: for example, the EU Taxonomy for sustainable finance encourages using reclaimed materials, and building certification systems (DGNB, BREEAM, etc.) now include criteria for reuse and circular design. A pre-demolition audit supported by robust data can provide the documentation needed for these frameworks (like proof of how much was reused or recycled).
Another broader implication is the creation of feedback loops into design and construction. When demolition audits are digitized and analyzed, the industry can learn which design practices lead to easier reuse or recycling. Over time, a database of audited buildings could reveal that certain connections or materials were consistently hard to reuse, whereas others were salvaged successfully. This knowledge can influence architects and engineers to design buildings today that will be easier to audit and deconstruct decades later – essentially “design for deconstruction”. Metaroom and BIM can facilitate this by providing a common data environment that could, for instance, connect with BIM models from the building’s design phase. Imagine a scenario where the BIM model created at audit (end of life) is matched to the original BIM (if available); one could assess how the building aged and how components fared, informing future material choices. This is speculative but highlights how digitalization can knit together the full building lifecycle for continuous improvement.
Finally, from a societal and compliance perspective, making pre-demolition audits more rigorous and transparent can improve accountability and enforcement. If every demolition has a digital audit, authorities can better enforce waste management laws because there is clear evidence of what should come out of the building. It becomes harder to illegally dump waste or to simply landfill materials that could be recycled, because the audit record “flags” those materials. In regions where audits are mandatory, digital records could be made public to ensure communities know what is happening with local demolitions (public transparency can drive companies to perform better). All of this supports a culture of responsibility in construction, aligning with sustainability goals.
In essence, the integration of 3D scanning into pre-demolition audits strengthens the link between technology and circular economy practices. It amplifies the benefits of the audits, helping turn what could be seen as a bureaucratic requirement into a genuine catalyst for sustainable outcomes. By easing the process, it encourages wider adoption of audits, and by improving data, it enables higher rates of reuse and recycling. The AEC industry stands to gain environmentally, economically (through material savings), and socially (through reduced pollution and innovation leadership) by embracing these methods.
Conclusion
Pre-demolition audits, once an obscure technical exercise, are rapidly becoming a cornerstone of sustainable building practice. This white paper has explored how the application of Metaroom 3D scanning technology can elevate these audits to meet modern efficiency demands and strict regulatory standards. Through detailed review, we found that tools like Metaroom could substantially streamline the audit process – capturing comprehensive spatial data, integrating material information via BIM, and thereby supporting auditors in producing thorough inventories of building components before demolition. This directly addresses the requirements of standards such as ÖNORM B3151 and DIN SPEC 91484, which call for extensive data collection and documentation to maximize reuse and ensure proper waste management. Metaroom effectively operationalizes these requirements: it provides an efficient means to gather the needed data (fulfilling the “what” specified by standards) and in many cases exceeds traditional methods in accuracy and clarity.
References
Austrian Standards Institute (ASI). (2022) ÖNORM B 3151: Dismantling of buildings as a standard method of demolition. Vienna: ASI. Available at: https://www.austrian-standards.at/en/shop/onorm-b-3151-2022-05-15~p2622876 (Accessed: 28 April 2025).
DIN – German Institute for Standardization. (2023) DIN SPEC 91484: Procedure to record building products as a basis to evaluate the potential for high-quality reutilization prior to demolition and renovation work (Pre-Demolition Audit). Berlin: DIN. Available at: https://www.dinmedia.de/en/technical-rule/din-spec-91484/371235753 (Accessed: 28 April 2025).
European Commission. (2018) EU Construction & Demolition Waste Management Protocol and Guidelines. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/news/eu-construction-and-demolition-waste-protocol-2018-09-18_en (Accessed: 28 April 2025).
CityLoops Project. (2021) CityLoops Guide for Pre-Demolition Audit. Copenhagen: CityLoops (EU Urban Innovation Action). Available at: https://cityloops.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Materials/Tools/Circular_demolition/Circular_demolition_-_Instrument_-_CityLoops_guide_for_selective_demolition.pdf (Accessed: 28 April 2025).
Politecnico di Torino – Zanetti, M.C. (Supervisor). (2020) The role of pre-demolition audit in C&D waste management. Master's thesis, Politecnico di Torino. Available at: https://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/16309/ (Accessed: 28 April 2025).
Amrax GmbH. (2024) Metaroom Tech Insights – Latest Innovations. Amrax Official Blog. Available at: https://amrax.ai/blog/ (Accessed: 28 April 2025).
